• Prospective
    Students
  • Current
    Students
  • Alumni
  • Research
  • News &
    Events
  • About Royal
    Roads
Main menu
  • Prospective Students
  • Current Students
  • Alumni
  • Research
  • News & Events
  • About Royal Roads
 
    • Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   VIURRSpace Home
    • RRU
    • Faculty Research Collection
    • Lokanan, Mark
    • View Item
    •   VIURRSpace Home
    • RRU
    • Faculty Research Collection
    • Lokanan, Mark
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Auditors’ liability and investors’ protection in Canada: The ‘leaky umbrella’

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Audit_Research_Paper_IBIMA_Revised_Preprint.pdf (370.9Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Lokanan, Mark
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Subject
    Fraud; Auditor liability
    Abstract
    In the spring of 1997, the Supreme Court of Canada (“Court”) rendered a decision in Hercules Managements Ltd. v. Ernst & Young [1997] (“Hercules”) that left shareholders out in the cold. Ever since the verdict in Hercules was released, the audit profession has been shielded from being held liable to third parties in cases of negligent misrepresentation. In Hercules, the Court ruled that audited reports are meant to inform management and creditors, but not for shareholders to make personal decisions. The Hercules’ ruling was labelled a “national embarrassment” and exposes investors to even more aggressive accounting techniques. As is evident from the spate of corporate accounting frauds since the verdict in 1997, Canadian corporations and their auditors found it easier to sidestep accounting rules to produce financial statements that make their companies look healthier, when in actual fact they were downright toxic. Accordingly, the study of auditors’ liability to third parties has a growing importance. In this paper, I argue that the Court’s endorsement in Hercules has set a dangerous precedent to limit the liability owed by auditors towards shareholders in preparing financial reports. The paper shows how the discourse from Hercules has been disseminated and consumed by the audit profession and corporate enterprises to the detriment of shareholders. The paper emphasizes the residing significance of the auditors to use the discourse in Hercules to privilege their clients’ interests and background the interests of non-contractual third parties.
    Description
    This article is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license. The version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.722196.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10613/6851
    http://dx.doi.org/10.25316/IR-1730
    https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.722196
    Collections
    • Lokanan, Mark
    Profile on PlumX

    Browse

    All of VIURRSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Admin LoginRegister
    back to top  
    Royal Roads University
    Our Location
    2005 Sooke Road
    Victoria, BC V9B 5Y2
    Canada
    •   Campus Map
    Get in Touch
    •   Phone: 250.391.2511
    •   Toll-free: 1.800.788.8028
    •   Email Us
    •   Directories
    @RoyalRoadsRRU FacebookRRU LinkedInRRU YouTubeRRU Pinterest
    • Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Website Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    • Academic Regulations
    • Copyright
    • Sitemap
    • ©2017 Royal Roads University
     
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV