• Prospective
    Students
  • Current
    Students
  • Alumni
  • Research
  • News &
    Events
  • About Royal
    Roads
Main menu
  • Prospective Students
  • Current Students
  • Alumni
  • Research
  • News & Events
  • About Royal Roads
 
    • Admin Login
    View Item 
    •   VIURRSpace Home
    • RRU
    • Faculty Research Collection
    • Vannini, Phillip
    • View Item
    •   VIURRSpace Home
    • RRU
    • Faculty Research Collection
    • Vannini, Phillip
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Wild walking: A twofold critique of the walk-along method

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Wildwalking_Vannini.pdf (378.0Kb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Vannini, Phillip
    Vannini, April
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Subject
    Scotland; Walking; Social sciences--Research
    Abstract
    Over the last decade the mobile research method known as the “go-along” (in its various manifestations such as the “ride-along” and the “walk-along”) has become increasingly popular. The popularity of the go-along makes great sense in light of evolving theoretical and substantive agendas across the social sciences toward embodied, sensory, and mobile ways of knowing (e.g. see Büscher, Urry, and Witchger 2010). Walking has a tremendous potential to animate spatial and sensory dynamics which static modes of inquiry cannot quite scrutinize. Nevertheless, not all is well and right with walk-alongs. As we will argue in this chapter, much of the methodological literature on walk-alongs and a great deal of the actual research conducted through walk-alongs still suffer from many of the same ailments that go-along methods were devised to cure. Walk-alongs, by and in large, are still too often informed by textualism, cognitivism, and representationalism. Walk-alongs are too often not sensuous enough, not spatialized enough, not mediated coherently enough, and not imaginative enough. Walk-alongs are also often too methodical, systematic, and pre-determined by a priori research agendas. Take for example this excerpt from the method section of a recent walk-along study which we reproduce nearly in full to evidence the style and orientation of the research approach: Three researchers conducted the walk-along interviews: a faculty member and two graduate assistants. Each graduate assistant received instruction and shadowed before conducting an independent one-to-one go-along interview. The interviews lasted an average of 48 minutes (range = 24 to 88 minutes). [...] Each interview began with an exercise that included “warm-up” questions about where to find a snack on campus; this was done to familiarize participants with the format of a go-along interview. The interview guide comprised four primary questions for the go-along interview on sexual health resources: […] (d) You’ve given me a lot of examples of sexual health resources at [name of college]. Can you tell me what your top five most important or helpful resources on campus would be, including what is actually here and any other ideas you might have? When the participant named a specific resource, the researcher asked to be shown it, and the two walked to the physical resource or went to a computer for online resources (Garcia et al. 2012, 1397-1398). In this paper we present a twofold critique to the walk-along method. Because we believe that walking is an embodied way of knowing, in what follows we each speak from our own embodied perspective, voice, and viewpoint. Thus, following this introduction we each follow a trail of our own in developing our own individual critiques of the walk-along method. Phillip’s critique focuses on enlivening the kinesthetic and cinematic potential of the walk-along method, whereas April’s critique concentrates on rethinking the very notion of walking as method. Regardless of our individual perspectives, we write our reflections on the basis of a shared event: a walk in Scotland’s Cairngorms National Park together with Chris Townsend, a British walker known worldwide for his multi-day walks. Though our arguments and critiques are distinct, they are similarly inspired by that walk with Chris and similarly motivated by our will to rethink the nature of walk-alongs and to reimagine walking as a “wilder” way of knowing.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10613/5718
    http://dx.doi.org/10.25316/IR-654
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561547-12
    Collections
    • Vannini, Phillip
    Profile on PlumX

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Of Walking Shoes, Boats, Golf Carts, Bicycles, and a Slow Technoculture: A Technography of Movement and Embodied Media on Protection Island, BC 

      Vannini, Phillip; Vannini, April S. (SAGE Publications, 2008)
      Drawing on participant observation conducted on Protection Island, British Columbia, this article examines the significance of technologies of movement and, in particular, embodied media. It advances the argument that ...
    • Thumbnail

      Toward a Technography of Everyday Life: The Methodological Legacy of James W. Carey's Ecology of Technoculture as Communication 

      Vannini, Phillip; Vannini, April S.; Hodson, Jaigris (SAGE Publications, 2009)
      This article identifies Carey's contributions to the concept of technoculture and attempts to systematize his writings on communication, culture, and technology in order to craft a methodological strategy for the study of ...
    • Thumbnail

      Side panel 

      Anthon, Dan; Vannini, Phillip; Taggart, Jonathan (2018-06-28)

    Browse

    All of VIURRSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Admin LoginRegister
    back to top  
    Royal Roads University
    Our Location
    2005 Sooke Road
    Victoria, BC V9B 5Y2
    Canada
    •   Campus Map
    Get in Touch
    •   Phone: 250.391.2511
    •   Toll-free: 1.800.788.8028
    •   Email Us
    •   Directories
    @RoyalRoadsRRU FacebookRRU LinkedInRRU YouTubeRRU Pinterest
    • Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Website Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    • Academic Regulations
    • Copyright
    • Sitemap
    • ©2017 Royal Roads University
     
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV