Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLehman, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T19:51:35Z
dc.date.available2018-02-09T19:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationLehman, R. (2002). The ambivalent advocate: Planning and the public interest. Plan Canada, 42(2), 17-18.en
dc.identifier.issn0032-0544
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.25316/IR-425
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10613/5478
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25316/IR-425
dc.description.abstractBob Lehman discusses the problem presented by the CIP Code of Professional Conduct's requirement that all planners must promote the public interest. In many instances planners are called upon to advocate for the private interests of particular clients. He suggests adopting an approach similar to the one currently in use in the accounting profession, in which planners could declare themselves advocates of a particular interest and be evaluated accordingly.en
dc.description.abstractBob Lehman s'interroge sur l'obligation, pour les urbanistes, de promouvoir l'intérêt public tel que prévu par le code de déontologie de l'ICU. L'urbaniste est souvent appelé à défendre les intérêts privés d'un client. M. Lehman propose d'imiter le modèle adopté par les professionnels en comptabilité, où l'urbaniste pourrait se déclarer represéntant d'intérêts particuliers et être évalué en conséquence.fr
dc.format.extent2 pg.en
dc.format.mediumtexten
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCanadian Institute of Plannersen
dc.subject.lcshPlanners--Professional ethicsen
dc.titleThe ambivalent advocate: Planning and the public interesten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.noteAbstract in English and French; text in English.en
dc.description.fulltexthttps://viurrspace.ca/bitstream/handle/10613/5478/Article004.pdf?sequence=3en
dc.identifier.doi10.25316/IR-425


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record